Russia-US diplomatic dispute could endanger Syria investigation

Orient Net 2017-10-22 11:50:00

expressive image

The United States is pushing for a quick vote by the United Nations Security Council on extending the authority of an inspection team charged with determining who is responsible for chemical-weapons attacks in Syria, putting itself at odds with Russia.

A confrontation that is looming at the United Nations between the United States and Russia could jeopardize an international investigation into chemical attacks in Syria, notably a deadly sarin bombing in the opposition-held town of Khan Sheikhoun last April.

There is no dispute that sarin, a lethal nerve agent banned by an international treaty Syria has signed, was used in the April 4 attack in the town of Khan Sheikhoun in northern Idlib countryside that killed and sickened hundreds. But Russia has cast doubts on Western assertions that Bashar Assad’s regime dropped a bomb containing the poison.

If a report by the panel, due next Thursday, finds Mr. Assad’s side responsible, the Russians have indicated they will use their veto power in the United Nations Security Council to terminate the mandate of the panel leading the investigation. The panel, whose mandate expires in November, is the only mechanism for establishing accountability for chemical weapons atrocities in Syria.

This week, Nikki R. Haley, the American ambassador to the United Nations, proposed moving up a Security Council vote to extend the panel’s mandate for a year — before the report’s expected release on Thursday.

“This should not be controversial, but some Council members have decided to make it so,” Ms. Haley said in a statement. “Basing the renewal on the contents of the next report, which the Russians would like to do, politicizes the process. We can’t work like that.”

Ms. Haley said there was “overwhelming support” in the Security Council for the panel’s work, which she called essential to finding and prosecuting the perpetrators of chemical weapons attacks in Syria — whoever they may be. “We can’t pick and choose who we want to be at fault and who we don’t,” she said.

In a memo Ms. Haley sent to other Security Council diplomats, seen Friday by The New York Times, she pressed them to support a vote in the next few days to renew the panel’s mandate, partly because its work is far from over. Aside from the Khan Sheikhoun attack, more than 60 “credible allegations” of chemical weapons use in Syria are still under review, she said, but the panel is already winding down its operations, “given the uncertainty surrounding its mandate.”

France threw its weight behind the Americans on Thursday. “We cannot accept that the credibility and independence of these mechanisms are challenged on the grounds that their conclusions are not suitable for Russia,” a Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Agnès Romatet-Espagne, told reporters in Paris.

The United Nations secretary general, António Guterres, said in a press briefing on Wednesday that the panel was a “very important tool, a tool addressing the problems of accountability,” and that “we fully support their activities.”

As of Friday it remained unclear when the Security Council vote would be scheduled, but Western diplomats hoped it could happen early next week. A Russian veto, should there be one, would put Russia in the position of shutting down what has been one of the few areas of cooperation with the United States and its allies on accountability in the war in Syria.

The deployment of chemical weapons, a war crime, has been a recurrent theme of the atrocities committed during the Assad war, which has dragged on for more than six years.

The panel seeking to identify who committed the chemical attacks, known as the Joint Investigative Mechanism, was created a few years ago as a collaborative operation of the United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, the group based in The Hague that monitors the global ban on such munitions.

Panel investigators have since found that Assad regime in Syria used chlorine-filled bombs on at least three occasions on 2014 and 2015 against opposition-held areas, and ISIS terrorists used mustard poison at least once. But the Khan Sheikhoun inquiry has been the panel’s biggest single undertaking.

You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times’s products and services.

The attack on Khan Sheikhoun led President Trump to order a punishing missile strike a few days later on the Shayrat military airfield in Syria where, American intelligence officials said, aircraft carrying the poison weapon had originated.

Russia accused the United States of rushing to judgment on who was responsible and initially asserted that the sarin attack had been fabricated as a pretext to vilify Bashar Assad. It strongly condemned the missile strike and threatened to disband the military communications that have minimized the risk of conflict between Russian and American forces operating in Syria.

The Russians have always expressed skepticism about both the Joint Investigative Mechanism’s objectivity and its ability to collect credible evidence in a war zone.

Those doubts intensified publicly last Friday, when a Russian Foreign Ministry disarmament expert, Mikhail Ulyanov, spoke at briefing for United Nations member states. He challenged the basic assumption about the Khan Sheikhoun attack that it had been carried out from the air.

Russia’s own photographic analysis, Mr. Ulyanov said, suggested that the crater left by the bomb showed it had been detonated on the ground, calling into question how Assad militant could have placed it there.

Mr. Ulyanov also said photographs of child victims — which Mr. Trump cited when he ordered the retaliatory attack — suggested that they had been given drugs to feign attack symptoms in what might have been a “staged incident” that the panel needed to address in its findings.

The panel’s chairman, Edmond Mulet, a longtime United Nations diplomat, has not commented on the conclusions of the report ahead of its release. But he is known to be frustrated over what he has viewed as a lack of Assad cooperation with the investigation.

After a private briefing to the Security Council in July — three months after the Khan Sheikhoun attack — Mr. Mulet told reporters that he needed Assad regime’s help and that “hopefully we’ll be given the necessary tools to do our work.”