US policy in Syria: Blood walls

US policy in Syria: Blood walls
Mohsen Saleh – in his article in Al-Jazeera ­– accuses the US of using the policies of weakening and dismantling in Syria to prolong the struggle and cause the redrawing of blood-borders and the recreation of a new racial and sectarian Sykes-Picot.

The writer then refutes the claims that the Iranian and Russian interventions in Syria are due to the US’ weakness and decline in its role in the region, arguing that all of these interventions pour into the “US windmill” without costing the US a dime or a life of its military personnel.

The writer then adds that the US policy in Syria secures the stability and continuity of the Zionist entity in the region, explaining that the US never desired to directly enter the game, but rather to manage it afar coinciding with Obama’s soft policies.

The writer explains that the US never allowed for the Syrian opposition to gain weaponry that could aid it against Assad’s brutal attacks. The US then turned a blind eye to Iran’s and Hezbollah’s direct military intervention to bolster Assad, especially since it gave a sectarian aspect to the fight.

In addition, the US denied the creation of safe and no-fly zones, leaving the air open for pro-Assad warplanes to bombard opposition-held areas.

Furthermore, the US withdrew from its ‘red line’ when Assad actually bombed civilians with chemical weapons, sufficing with a solution for Assad to destroy Syria’s chemical weapons, which directly fed to the benefit of Israel.

Lastly, the US benefited greatly from Russia’s intervention since it aimed at bombing the Syrian opposition – which has never adhered to American standards in its religion, identity and future dreams – in addition to minimizing Iran’s influence in Syria. Russia’s intervention also made the conflict in Syria appear to be a “fight against terrorism” rather than a “people’s revolution against Assad,” which shifted the attention to ISIS rather than to the atrocities committed by Assad on to the Syrian people. 

The writer then explains that all of the proposed solutions for Syria aim in the end at weakening and partitioning Syria into smaller sectarian statelets.

التعليقات (0)

    0

    الأكثر قراءة

    💡 أهم المواضيع

    ✨ أهم التصنيفات